Sample layout. Not a real client.
Trade, city: the problem in one line
- Starting point
- Rank grid before any change
- What changed
- The one or two changes that moved it
- Result
- Rank grid after, and the change in calls
Many of your customers find you on a phone, often in a hurry. I use your site on real phones, find what makes it hard to read, tap or call from, and fix those things one at a time.
No long contracts. You talk to Simon.
Map pack: furnace repair santee
A
B
C
Scientific SEO
Mobile usability is how easily a person on a phone can read your page, find what they need and act on it, which for a service company usually means calling or sending a request. Mobile SEO means keeping the phone version of the site complete and usable, because that is the version Google reads and the one many of your customers see first.
The first check is that nothing is missing, because Google indexes the phone version. I compare the desktop and phone versions of each main page for the same text, headings, links and schema. Text placed in an expandable section still counts, because it’s still in the page. Text the phone layout removes entirely doesn’t.
A mobile menu that leaves out the service pages is the same problem in another form.
The phone number is the most important element on a service company’s mobile page, and it has to work as a button. That means a number coded as a tap-to-call link, visible without scrolling, large enough to hit with a thumb and not crowded by other links. A number that is really part of an image, or one with a chat bubble sitting on top of it, looks fine in a desktop preview. With call tracking in place, the calls that come from that button can be counted.
A name, a phone number, a line about the problem and a ZIP code are enough for a first contact. The phone field should bring up the number keypad, and fields should be labeled so the phone can fill in saved details. Each extra required field is one more reason to give up, and the search results, with your competitors in them, are one tap back.
Most obstacles are either laid over the page or sized for a bigger screen. A coupon or newsletter pop-up that covers the screen on arrival is the first kind, and Google treats intrusive pop-ups as a mark against a page. Stacked widgets do the same job: a chat bubble, a cookie notice and a sticky bar together can cover much of a small screen.
The second kind is small text and wide tables, anything that forces pinching to zoom or scrolling sideways. Footer links packed so closely that a thumb hits the wrong one belong with them.
A resized desktop browser window hides the problems that matter, so I test by hand. Google used to offer a mobile-friendly test and a mobile usability report for site owners. It has retired both, so there’s no official pass mark to point at.
I go through each main page on an iPhone and an Android phone, on mobile data, doing what a customer would do: read, tap the number, fill out the form. I fix each problem on its own and recheck it on the same phones, then check rankings about two weeks later.
Usability covers the page once it’s on screen, and how fast it gets there is measured separately. Many phone customers never reach your site at all: they call straight from your Google Business Profile in the map pack, and a well-built mobile site does nothing for those calls. For the ones who do tap through, usability and speed are both part of technical SEO.
Every engagement starts and ends with the same measurement.
Sample layout. Not a real client.
A responsive site can still fail a customer. Responsive means the layout rearranges itself to fit the screen, which is the right foundation. It says nothing about whether the phone number can be tapped, whether a pop-up covers the page, whether small text forces pinching to zoom or whether the form is bearable to fill out with a thumb. I check those by using the site on an iPhone and an Android phone, on mobile data, which a theme label can't do for you.
No. One responsive site that serves the same pages to every device is the simpler and safer setup, because there's only one version for Google to read and for you to maintain. Separate mobile sites tend to drift out of step with the main one. An app makes little sense for a company a homeowner calls only when something breaks.
Yes, if the text is removed from the phone version, because that is the version Google indexes. Text placed in expandable sections still counts. I compare both versions page by page to see which case you have.
It usually helps, with a condition. A call button fixed to the bottom of the screen keeps the number within reach on long pages, which suits urgent trades. It must not cover content or sit under a chat bubble. I add it as a single change and compare calls before and after, so you know whether it earned its place.
I go through your main pages on a phone the way a customer would, starting from the website address you enter here.
Prefer to talk? Call (619) 675-7678, 9am to 6pm.